The chart below gives information on the amount of time taken to manufacture a vehicle by four US-based car producers between 1998 and 2002.
Practice this IELTS Writing Task 1 question on IELTSX. The chart below gives information on the amount of time taken to manufacture a vehicle by four US-based car producers between 1998 and 2002.
Amount of time taken to manufacture a vehicle by four US-based car producers between 1998 and 2002 - IELTS Writing Task 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

A student's answer to this task, and the feedback on it
Written by an IELTSX user under exam conditions and published unedited and anonymously. Band 9 ยท 206 words.
The line graph illustrates the amount of time required to manufacture a vehicle by four car manufacturers (Nissan, DaimlerChrysler, General Motors and Ford) between 1998 and 2002, measured in hours per vehicle.
Overall, the production time declined for all four manufacturers over the five-year period. Nissan experienced the most dramatic reduction and became the fastest producer by 2002, whereas Ford showed only slight fluctuations and remained relatively stable throughout the period.
In 1998, Nissan recorded the longest production time at approximately 37 hours per vehicle. However, this figure fell sharply to around 30 hours in 1999 before continuing to decrease steadily to 24 hours in 2000, 22 hours in 2001 and just 21 hours by the end of the period. Similarly, General Motors reduced its production time consistently from about 32 hours in 1998 to 24 hours in 2002.
By contrast, DaimlerChrysler started at around 34 hours per vehicle and declined to 31 hours in 1999. It then remained unchanged until 2001 before dropping further to approximately 28 hours in the final year. Ford, on the other hand, recorded the shortest production time initially, at 25 hours in 1998. This figure increased slightly to 27 hours by 2001 before falling marginally to 26 hours in 2002.
Examiner feedback
This is an exceptional response that meets all the criteria for Band 9. It provides a clear, concise, and highly accurate summary of the line graph, utilizing sophisticated vocabulary and flawless grammar.
Task Achievement - 9
- The response fully satisfies all requirements of the task, providing a comprehensive and accurate description of the data. - The overview is sophisticated, identifying both the general trend and specific rankings (Nissan becoming the fastest). - Key features are skillfully selected and illustrated with precise data points from the chart.
Coherence & Cohesion - 9
- Information is logically sequenced; the first body paragraph focuses on the most significant changes, while the second focuses on the more stable/fluctuating data. - Cohesive devices (e.g., 'By contrast', 'whereas', 'Similarly') are used naturally and effectively to link ideas. - Paragraphing is logical and helps the reader follow the comparison between manufacturers effortlessly.
Lexical Resource - 9
- A wide range of vocabulary is used with precision (e.g., 'dramatic reduction', 'slight fluctuations', 'recorded', 'marginally'). - Collocations are native-like (e.g., 'production time fell sharply', 'remained relatively stable'). - There are no errors in spelling or word formation.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy - 9
- The response demonstrates a wide range of complex structures, including subordinate clauses and participial phrases. - Sentences are consistently error-free throughout the response. - Punctuation is used correctly to enhance clarity and flow.
Related prompts
- Male Female Students Art Related Subjects UK University 2011
- Town Centre Changes 1990 and Today
- Male Female Students High Grades Five Subjects Parston School National Average
- Qualifications Staff Advertising Company 1990 and 2010
- Australian School Leavers Activity 1980 1990 2000
- Layout Town Shopping Centre Present and Future Redevelopment